Página:La búsqueda por materia y la descripción de contenido en el catálogo en línea.djvu/72

CNEA. lll Jomadas Nacionales sobre Microisis: Mar del Plata, 24, 25 y 26 de noviembre de 1993. Mar del Plata: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, 1993. Cochrane PA. Modem subject access in the online age. American libraries 1984; l5(2):80—3; 15(3): 145-8, 150; 15(4):250-2, 254-5; 15(5):336-9; l5(6)- .438—41; 15(7):527-9. Connell TH. Techniques to improve subject retrieval in online catalogs: flexible access to elements in the bibliographic records. lnfonnation technology and libraries 1991; 10(2):87-98. Cousins SA. Enhancing subject access to OPACS: controlled vocabulary vs. natu- ral language. Joumal of documentation 1992; 48(3):291—309. Culkin PB. Rethinking OPACS: the design of assertive information systems. information technology and libraries 1989; 8(2):172-7 . Del Bigio G. Conferencia. En: ll Jomadas Na- cionales y l Latinoamericanas y del Cari- be sobre Microisis: Buenos Aires, 15 al 23 de junio de 1992. Suplemento. Bue- nos Aires: CNEA, 1992:4978 Drabenstott KM, Demeyer AN, Gerckens J, Poe DT. Analysis of a bibliographic database enhanced with a library classification. Library resources and technical services 1990; 34(2):179-98. Drabenstott KM. The need lor machine-readable authority records for topical subdivisions. Information technology and libraries 1992; 11(2):9l-lO4. Dubois CPR. Free text vs. controlled Vocabulary: a reassessment. Online review 1987; 11(4):243-53. Duval BK, Main L. Automated library systems: a librariansguide and teaching manual. Westport: Meckler, 1992 (Computers in Libraries; 64). Dwyer J.— B ibliographic records enhancement: from the drawing board to the catalog screen. Cataloging and classification 1991; -13(3/4):29-52. Dykstra M. LC subject headings dlsguised as a “ thesawusLibraryjownal1988; 11324.2- 6.- Dykstra NLPRECls-in the ‘online. catalog. Cataloging and ‘classiscation quarterly 72' 1992. Ensor P. User characteristics of keyword searching in an OPAC. College research libraries 1991; 53(1):72-80 . Ensor P. User practices in keyword and boolean searching on the online public access Catalog. Information technology and libraries 1992: ll(3):210-9 . Federación lntemacional de la Documenta- ción. CDU: Clasificación decimal univer- sal. 6 ed. abreviada española. Madrid: AENOR, 1991. Fidel R. Searchers' selection of search keys: ll. Controlled vocabulary or free-text searching. Journal of the American Society for lnfonnation Science 1991a; 42(7):50l-l4. Fidel R. Searchers' selection of search keys: lll. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science l991b; 42(7):515-27. Fidel R. Who needs controlled vocabulary? Special libraries 1992; 83(1): 1-9. Foskett AC. The subject approach to information. 5 ed. London: Library Association Publishing, 1996. Foskett DJ. Concerning general and special classification. lntemational classification 1991; 18(2):87-9l . Frost CO. Faculty use of subject searching in card and online catalog. Information technology and libraries 1987; 6(1):60- 3. Gerhan DR. LCSH in vivo: subject searching performance and strategy in the OPAC era. Joumal of academic librarianship 1989; 15(2):83-9 . Gódert W. Facet classification in online retrieval. International classification 1991; 18(2):98»109. Gregor D, Mandel C. Cataloging mtst change. Library joumal 1991; 116:42—7. Guenther RS. The development and implementation of the USMARC fomtat for classification data. Information technology and libraries 1992; 1l(2):l20-31. Hancock M. Subject searching behaviour at the «library catalogue and at the shelves: implications foronlineinteracsve catalo- gues. Joumal of documentation 1987; 43(4):303—21 . Hancock-Beaulieu M. Evaluating-theimpact of 1989; 10(2): 81-94.